The Drum draws on a major study conducted by EY, recently published in Possible Miami, to gain insight into Pret a Manger and Krispy Kreme's subscription battles.
The introduction of subscription models in the retail and food service industries is a strategic move aimed at increasing customer loyalty and ensuring a stable revenue stream. But the recent fiasco surrounding Krispy Kreme and Pret a Manger's apps shows that even well-intentioned efforts can end in disaster if not executed correctly. Here we examine the developing controversy and the lessons that can be learned from it.
subscription promise
Subscription models have revolutionized the industry by providing convenience and value to customers while providing predictable recurring revenue to businesses. Krispy Kreme and Pret A Manger, sister companies under JAB Holdings, have taken on this model in hopes of improving customer engagement and sales consistency. For example, Pret's Coffee subscriptions offer unlimited hot drinks for a monthly fee, and Krispy Kreme recently introduced a similar system for donuts.
collapse begins
But what was supposed to be a smooth development turned into chaos. Technical glitches and operational failures plagued both companies, frustrating customers, damaging their brand reputations, and leading to a lot of negative press. Subscription models that relied heavily on app functionality stumbled because they underestimated the technical challenges involved. Customers experienced app crashes, incorrect charges, and issues with subscription redemptions, leading to widespread dissatisfaction.
The Telegraph reported that both companies faced backlash as customers took to social media to air their grievances, exposing the extent of operational flaws. The disruption wasn't limited to the customer experience. It also revealed deficiencies in internal communications and staff readiness, with employees struggling to respond to a surge in subscription redemptions and technical inquiries.
Key Lesson: The Key Nature of Loyalty Schemes
The Drum looked to a study conducted by EY on loyalty strategies (recently published in Possible Miami) to gain insight into what clearly went wrong.
There are several key areas where Krispy Kreme and Pret stumbled. First and foremost, the infrastructure required to support such a subscription model is underestimated. EY emphasizes the importance of robust technology solutions that can handle increasing loads and complex data interactions. In this example, both brands may have been unable to match their IT capabilities to the ambitious scale of their subscription services.
Next, EY points out the importance of customer experience management in loyalty programs. The success of a loyalty scheme relies heavily on seamless integration of technology, staff training, and clear communication. Failure in any of these areas can lead to customer dissatisfaction, especially in a social media-driven market where negative experiences are quickly amplified.
Consumer trust and brand damage
The backlash from these operational issues extends beyond the immediate frustration of customers. EY's presentation highlights the long-term impact of loyalty program failures. Trust, once broken, is difficult to rebuild. For consumer-facing companies like Pret and Krispy Kreme, the impact of such failures can lead to the loss of loyal customers and a diminished brand image, deterring potential new customers.
Additionally, the economic impact can be significant. Although subscriptions are intended to smooth out revenue fluctuations, the costs associated with correcting these failures, such as refunds, additional customer service resources, and potential legal issues, may reduce the expected benefits. It may be cancelled.
Recovery and rebuilding
Recovering from such setbacks requires a multifaceted approach. Businesses need to address pressing technical issues and ensure their app platforms are robust and reliable. Equally important is retraining staff and revising internal communication protocols to better manage customer expectations and reactions.
It is also important to proactively engage with affected customers. Offering compensation, such as an extended free subscription period or a direct apology, can help mitigate some of the immediate damage to your customer relationship.
road ahead
For Krispy Kreme and Plett, the way forward includes not only addressing the current crisis, but also taking proactive steps to prevent such problems from happening again. This may include investing in advanced technology infrastructure, revising our operating procedures, and continually monitoring the execution of our subscription model.
Additionally, these experiences provide lessons for other companies in the consumer sector considering subscription models. The key takeaway from EY's insights is that planning, testing and preparation are critical. These elements must be thoroughly evaluated and implemented to avoid the pitfalls experienced by Krispy Kreme and Pret.
conclusion
The unfolding situation at Krispy Kreme and Pret A Manger should be a wake-up call for all consumer-facing companies. Loyalty schemes and subscription models can be highly profitable, but require careful planning and solid execution. Companies must not only attract customers with promises, but also ensure that they are well equipped to consistently deliver on those promises. As these companies navigate recovery, the entire industry will be watching and learning, hopefully leading to better execution strategies in the future.
In conclusion, while Krispy Kreme and Plett's intentions to revolutionize customer engagement through subscriptions are laudable, their execution is flawed and the delicate balance needed to design and deploy new customer loyalty schemes is challenged. It became clear. The lessons learned from their experiences will shape how companies approach similar strategies with greater focus in the future.
